• The market turns green for the week as tech rallies
  • Review four recent trades
  • My strategy for trading in an uncertain environment

For a while this week – it looked as though it was going to be four straight bearish weeks for the S&P 500 and Dow Jones.

However, today the bulls stepped up to the plate. Or more accurately – big tech stepped up! 

As prices touched a low of 3209 on the S&P 500 – the index came within ~1.6% of the 35-week EMA (3158) 

And surprise surprise – it was big tech which carried the market.

What else?

For example, Amazon rose 2.5% and Facebook gained 2.1%.

Apple advanced 3.8% (more on Apple shortly); and Microsoft climbed 2.3%. Overall, the tech sector jumped 2.4% and for its best day since Sept. 9. 

And this makes sense…  as much of September’s losses have been concentrated with this sector.

For example, Apple has falled ~13% this month. Microsoft, Alphabet, Netflix, Amazon and Facebook are all down at least 7.9% over that time period. 

S&P 500 – Sept 25 2020

As readers know – I expect the zone of 3000 to 3100 to act as strong support for the market. 

However, 3209 might be the near-term low? It’s impossible to know. 

What troubles me (technically) is two-fold

(a) the failing momentum on the weekly-MACD with strong negative divergence; and
(b) the false break of the February high. 

In my experience – this looks like a setup for lower prices. 

Reviewing Recent Positions

Over the past two months or so – I offered readers at least four different trading ideas: 

1/ Hilton – July 15 – “Why There’s Pain Ahead for Major City Hotels
2/ Alibaba – Aug 07 – A New Trade from a Coming Cold War w/China
3/ Intel – Aug 14 – “A New Trade on an Old Tech Name
4/ Apple – Sep 08 – Tech Has More Room to Fall…”

These trades are incremental to warning readers about the potential for a 10% correction in the broader market last month – and for us to expect gold and silver prices to ease. 

But what I wanted to do is check in with each of these trades specifically (as I said I would). 

Are they profitable or did I get it all wrong?

1. Hilton

My thesis here was city-based hotels – largely dependent on corporate travel – struggling with high fixed costs and sagging demand – were in trouble due to COVID.

And whilst Hilton had rallied sharply from its lows – the enthusiasm for a v-shaped recovery in the hotel sector looked overdone. 

I was looking at selling the $95 Oct 16 Call  (which at the time had 93 days to expiry). The contract sold for $3.15 giving me a yield of above 16%. 

In other words, I expect Hilton to stay below $95 by the time of expiry. 

Well after I placed the trade Hilton fell… found support and rallied a bit further (which I expected).. and then found resistance.

And with only 14 trading days remaining before this trade expires – the contract is trading for $0.63

In other words, we could close out this trade by buying back the position for $0.63 – giving us a nice profit. However I am willing to let this trade play out and pocket the entire $3.15 in premium. 

Hilton will need to rally at least 14% (ie to $98.15) over the next 14 trading days for this trade to lose money. Note – the break-even price is the strike price ($95) plus the option premium received ($3.15)

Probabilities are I will make 16% annualized on the trade for the capital I put up as risk. 

2. Alibaba

Whilst I had a bearish bias wit Hilton – that was not the case with Alibaba.

With BABA I was bullish. 

With this trade – I sold BABA Oct 16 $215 Puts for a premium of $5.40 – risking my capital for 72 days. 

Here I was looking to make an ~13% annualized return (i.e. (($5.40 / $215) x 365) / 72 = 12.7%)

Well not long after I placed the trade – BABA rallied strongly. 

My thesis was the market was over-reacting to Trump’s TikTok and WeChat bans – which had nothing to do with BABA. 

Today that contract is trading for just $0.36

Again I will simply let these contracts expire worthless over the next 14 trading days and make ~13% on the capital I put at risk. 

3. Intel 

Similar to BABA – I was bullish on the outlook for Intel. 

And whilst I didn’t think Intel was going to “knock the lights out” with some kind of 20+ rally in the near-term – I thought the market had over-reacted (to the downside) on its latest result. 

Cash flow was still very strong and revenue growth was there. However, they did mismanage the delivery of their latest 7nm chip – gifting consumer market share to AMD. 

I decided to sell the Oct 16th $42.50 strike puts for 76c.

The trade had 66 days to its expiry and offered me a ~10% annualized return; ie ((0.76 / $42.50) * 365) / 66 = 9.9% annualized)

Well today that contract trades for just $0.09. 

Again, I will simply let these expire worthless and bank the annualized 10% return on my capital. 

4. Apple

For some reason, my trade on Apple received the most attention (and questions) from readers. 

I guess that makes sense – it is one of the most traded stocks in the world. 

Now at the time – Apple was trading around $120 – and well off its highs.

And whilst I felt that Apple could fall further – I was happy selling Nov 20 $80 Puts for $1.15

My yield on this trade wasn’t ideal – just under 8% annualized – my I was not willing to pay more than $80 for Apple’s stock. 

As it happened – Apple did drop after I placed the trade – with the Put option contract jumping to around $1.50 (i.e., much higher than the $1.15 I sold it for)

Obviously I wished I could have got $1.50 when I sold it – but I don’t pretend to get the timing right every time. And that’s ok. 

Today Apple is closed the week at $112.28 – down around $8 from when I sold the put option. 

But what do we see with the put options I sold? 

You would think that put option would be much higher right (given the stock was down sharply and closer to the $80 strike price) 

Wrong.

Today they are trading for just $0.73 – a long way below the $1.15 I sold them for – as volatility comes out of the stock. 

Good news! 

For those less familiar – option premiums are high when volatility is high. 

I am happy to keep this position on – as I would ideally like to buy Apple for $80 if the opportunity presents over the next two months.

And if it doesn’t – then I will simply keep the option premium (like the other three trades).

Putting it All Together

In this case, it turns out we will be “four from four” with these trades. 

I have placed three other trades which are also going well – but these were not posted to the blog (there’s only so much time in the week to write)

The idea behind these trades is three-fold: 

 

  • These are generally stocks I want to own (or be short) at a specific price; 
  • In most cases, I’m looking to make at least 10% annualized return on my risk capital; and
  • I never risk more than 20% of my total capital on any one trade

I don’t pretend to get every trade right – but 60% of the time they work out.

Lately that number has been a lot higher. 

Sometimes things go your way and sometimes they don’t. 

I hope these trades (and my logic) gives you some insight into how I think about trading this highly uncertain market. 

As an aside, my total return so far this year is around +10% after experiencing a small hit during March sell-off (as I moved to mostly cash late February – as warned on the blog).  

Regards,
Adrian Tout

Related
Fed Pledges Its ‘Support’… As Retail Sales Plunge

Fed Pledges Its ‘Support’… As Retail Sales Plunge

Investors were given a reminder this week on just where the consumer is. Retail sales dropped 1.1% last month, with receipts declining almost across the board. Data for October was revised down to show sales slipping 0.1% instead of rising 0.3%...
Why the Fed Will Continue to Print

Why the Fed Will Continue to Print

Core PCE Inflation at 2.0% to 2.50% is something that Fed aggressively targets. However, for a decade it's been stubbornly below its objective. And until we see this target level be achieved (and sustained for a period) - I see no reason why the Fed is about to tighten or withdraw its support.
The Case for Gold Remains Strong

The Case for Gold Remains Strong

This posts makes the case for gold. If I’m correct (and I may not be) - we will see massive fiscal deficits from government enabled by Federal Reserve bank money creation as a result of the long-term damage inflicted. And that's a bullish scenario for gold...